- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:44:47 +0000
- To: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I was trying to check a test case to confirm something in Concepts/Semantics docs, and found that: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf returned an HTTP 403/Forbidden error page. Also: re: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test003.rdf The comment is misleading - there is no xml:lang - though the test is OK, I think. Do we have any entailment tests dealing with language-tagged plain literals? E.g. 1. ex:subject ex:prop "chat" . ?entails? ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@fr . 2. ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@en . ?entails? ex:subject ex:prop "chat" . 3. ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@en . ?entails? ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@fr . I think the answer is no in each case, and that would be in agreement with my readiong of the docs. Should these be negative entailment test cases? #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 08:34:09 UTC