- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:44:47 +0000
- To: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I was trying to check a test case to confirm something in
Concepts/Semantics docs, and found that:
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf
returned an HTTP 403/Forbidden error page.
Also:
re: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/test003.rdf
The comment is misleading - there is no xml:lang - though the test is OK, I
think.
Do we have any entailment tests dealing with language-tagged plain literals?
E.g.
1.
ex:subject ex:prop "chat" .
?entails?
ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@fr .
2.
ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@en .
?entails?
ex:subject ex:prop "chat" .
3.
ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@en .
?entails?
ex:subject ex:prop "chat"@fr .
I think the answer is no in each case, and that would be in agreement with
my readiong of the docs.
Should these be negative entailment test cases?
#g
-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 08:34:09 UTC