- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:04:32 +0100
- To: "pat hayes <phayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> The publishable version is now at > > http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Semantics_finalCall_1.html > > This passes the W3C XHTML and CSS validators, and has a whole lot of > links added to it. There is still one thing to do, which is to > re-draw figure 2, I'll do that tomorrow after the telecon, OK? . > > Note the final _1. Ive left the previous version (of 2 days ago) at > the older url in case anyone still wants to check the altered text, > which is highlighted in that version. (Or you could just go into the > header and switch newstuff back on.) There are a few tiny rewordings > in the above version, nothing super-editorial. for the moment I have no deep remarks, just that in 3.1 you seem to use "xxx"^^rdf:XMLLiteral@yyy instead of "xxx"@yyy^^rdf:XMLLiteral and in 4.1 similarly "yyy"^^rdf:XMLLiteral@zzz instead of "yyy"@zzz^^rdf:XMLLiteral and while looking for @, we found some in 2 and 3.4 backwards from the @consequent E and to construct a @satisfying rdfs-interpretation we also checked the test cases using rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class . and that seems to be OK rdfs4a' and rdfs4b' seem to be the same, but I guess you meant rdfs:range in rdfs4b' [will continue later] -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 04:06:03 UTC