Re: Test cases, quick update.

At 08:10 PM 12/11/02 +0100, Jos De_Roo wrote:
>[[[
>### inconsistency/incompleteness detections @@
>
>{ :xsdI1 . ?p rdfs:range xsd:string . ?s ?p ?x^^xsd:decimal } log:implies
>{ _:x a test:False-Document } .
>]]]
>
>and then indeed we can derive from above that
>
>_:y a test:False-Document .

I'm sorry but I'm really struggling with this... as far as I can tell, all 
the above says is that the antecedent implies there exists a false 
document, which seems pretty strange to me.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 05:10:05 UTC