- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:05:48 +0200
- To: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
If we have now agreed (and I think we have) that rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource . then the text in the Vocabulary doc about rdf:object "No range is defined for this property since values of rdfs:object can include both Literals and Resources" now seems incorrect. And in fact, we should explicitly define the range of rdf:object to be rdfs:Resource. Right? Patrick [Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 04:07:25 UTC