- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:01:19 -0600
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Can someone remind me what we decided about whether literals were >resources or not? Actually it kind of follows from the MT that simple literals must be resources, since 1. they denote themselves, and 2. anything that is denoted must be a resource. Typed literals are another kettle of fish, of course. >Specifically, I'm trying to revise a sentence in the Primer that says: > >"All classes are implicitly subclasses of class rdfs:Resource (since >the instances belonging to all classes are resources)" > >against which there is a question concerning rdfs:Literal. There shouldnt be. Anything that can be in a class must be a resource. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 17:01:33 UTC