- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 10 Dec 2002 12:59:43 -0600
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 12:33, pat hayes wrote: [...] > I honestly do not know what it is that is bothering you so much here. I'm not at all sure I have time to explain. I would like the chair to please note that I think the introduction of terms like 'rdf engine' and 'rdf reasoner' goes well beyond editorial discretion and should be discussed with the WG. Perhaps I'm the only one who thinks there's a problem; in which case, I don't think I'll choose this as one of the battles that I put a lot of energy into. > All of these languages are intended for use by software, so why the > prohibition against referring to what software is supposed to do or > not do? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 13:59:41 UTC