- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:20:31 +0200
- To: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Here is my proposed verbage regarding terms with undefined semantics, for inclusion into the Primer. Frank, feel free to wordsmith freely. Note that the list was based on there being no defined semantics for the term in the MT, even if there might be range, domain, type, or other assertions made about the terms. The list (or the MT) may need adjusting if it is incorrect... rdf:li was not mentioned in the MT, but that may be an omission since it's in the syntax doc. It is included in the list below. -- The RDF/S vocabulary includes several terms the meaning of which was undefined or ambiguous in earlier specifications of RDF and which remain undefined in the present RDF MT. Specifically: rdf:value rdf:Bag rdf:Seq rdf:Alt rdf:li rdf:_n rdf:List rdf:first rdf:rest rdf:nil rdfs:comment rdfs:seeAlso rdfs:isDefinedBy rdfs:label These terms remain in the RDF/S vocabulary for various historical reasons. Their lack of an explicit or clear interpretation has resulted in their being used in incompatable ways by different applications. Nevertheless, as they provide utility to certain RDF applications, and in the interest of backwards compatability, they have not been deprecated or removed. Note that some of these terms do have certain constraints defined in the MT for their use, such as their domain, range or type, but their actual meaning is not specified. Users should take care when employing these terms, as there is no guaruntee that any RDF applications will interpret them as intended. It should also be noted that no valid inferences may be drawn from statements using these terms, insofar as the model theory is concerned. Any interpretation or inference based on these terms is entirely application specific. This document contains examples which reflect how some of these terms have been previously used; however such usage is merely suggestive and in no way constitutes a normative definition of their meaning or purpose. -- Patrick [Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 07:20:34 UTC