RE: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues

>  I hope I can still point at something useful at
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-blank-node-id

This link will be preserved and point to something that explains what one
is. As I indicated earlier, it does not feel like a normative part of the
abstract syntax. Does this need to be normative for you?

I don't think the defining text is changing much.

It doesn't give you a syntax for these things though - I note that the XML
balnk node ID and the N-triples blank node ID have different syntaxes.


Jeremy

Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 07:15:04 UTC