- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 21:46:25 +0000
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I've done most of the changes noted in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Dec/0032.html Done: * rdf:XMLLiteral * XML Literal now Literal / literal(), Typed Literal/typed-literal() * resolve() added for uris * generated-blank-node-id() added for bnodeids * Updated blank nodeid section * Deleted Appendix A (issues), B.2 (other schemas), C (changes - most) * Updated various notes Additionally I also: * Split identifier event into uri & bnodeid events - made the actions neater. Still to do: * parseType literal words / canonicalisation * updates for any concepts renumbering * references check, fix * get the intro similar to other drafts * link check Actually I'm wondering about the title again, since I think that: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) W3C Working Draft is actually redundant; it doesn't need "Specification" in the title, so, how about: RDF/XML Syntax (Revised) W3C Working Draft The current state is snapshotted at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Dec/att-0021/01-index.html (no pictures, examples, relax ng schemas linked) Dave
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 16:47:05 UTC