- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:44:04 +0000
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Reviewing the mailing list archive, the discussion of the semantics of
rdf:value seems have originated in:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0648.html
[[General comment, not specifically Primer: the description of rdf:value is
fine, but how does it relate to a normative specification? What can we say
formally about rdf:value? What formal semantics (interpretation) allows
us to make inferences like: ...]
Reviewing the issues list, I find:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value
[[
Resolution: This issue was discussed by the RDFCore WG on 11 January 2002
which resolved:
o resolves to not change the name of this property at this time on the grounds:
- insufficient reasons to make this change
- will cause existing uses to be illegal - such as examples in m&s
o resolves to recast this issue as a need to clarify the semantics of
rdf:value.
At the February 2002 face to face meeting, the RDFCore WG resolved:
* that rdf:value is a property defined in the RDF namespace
* that the model theory state that rdf:value is a property
* that no other model theory semantics is defined specifically for it
* the issue be closed.
]]
In the absence of new information this issue will not be reopened.
Brian
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 08:42:38 UTC