- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:44:04 +0000
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Reviewing the mailing list archive, the discussion of the semantics of rdf:value seems have originated in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0648.html [[General comment, not specifically Primer: the description of rdf:value is fine, but how does it relate to a normative specification? What can we say formally about rdf:value? What formal semantics (interpretation) allows us to make inferences like: ...] Reviewing the issues list, I find: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value [[ Resolution: This issue was discussed by the RDFCore WG on 11 January 2002 which resolved: o resolves to not change the name of this property at this time on the grounds: - insufficient reasons to make this change - will cause existing uses to be illegal - such as examples in m&s o resolves to recast this issue as a need to clarify the semantics of rdf:value. At the February 2002 face to face meeting, the RDFCore WG resolved: * that rdf:value is a property defined in the RDF namespace * that the model theory state that rdf:value is a property * that no other model theory semantics is defined specifically for it * the issue be closed. ]] In the absence of new information this issue will not be reopened. Brian
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 08:42:38 UTC