- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 10:18:56 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>At 11:44 PM 12/3/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >>>Related to all this, I think there is a legitimate caveat: if one >>>makes legally binding statements using language terms defined by >>>some other party, then one would be well advised to confirm that >>>they define the terms persistently in a fashion that corresponds >>>to the expected meaning. So, in important documents, one would >>>probably limit oneself to using vocabulary defined by some >>>reputable organization, or standards body, etc. >> >>Good point to make. If you use terms from sources that you don't >>trust, they may have consequences that you don't intend. Caveat >>lector. > >Wouldn't that be caveat scriptor? Well, OK, I guess. BUt the point is that if I invent a term and 'define' it and then you read it and use it some way that isnt in line with what I said about it, then you, the reader of what I wrote, have the responsibility for the mistake (and any of its consequences). Put another way, I can't be held responsible for other people's misunderstandings of my meanings. > >Jeremy: > >maybe there are a few words that should added to the Concepts draft? e.g. > >[[ >In publishing a statement with potentially significant legal or >social consequences, one should take care to use vocabulary whose >meaning is well-defined, stable and known to correspond to the >intended meaning. For important documents, such as contracts, this >may mean that use of third-party vocabulary is restricted to terms >defined by legislature, recognized standards bodies or other >reputable organizations. Using terms from untrustworthy sources may >have unintended consequences. >]] > >In view of this discussion, maybe this can help to clarify some of >the relationship between third party vocabularies and meanings? I >think it does address at least one of the comments we've received. Yes, I like the above. But I think that the general principle goes beyond just the 'significant' legal cases: it applies everywhere. Pat > >#g > > >------------------- >Graham Klyne ><GK@NineByNine.org> -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 11:18:33 UTC