- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 14:51:22 -0600
- To: fmanola@mitre.org
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>More discussion below: > snip > > >> So more generally, to the WG: should I give rdf:value a model theory? >> Speak soon, guys. Unless I hear otherwise I will do this: >> >> aaa rdf:value "bbb" . >> >> means that there is some conventional mapping M from lexical forms >> under which I(aaa) = M(bbb). Doesn't say much, but it might be >> useful, particularly if we say that any datatype L2V mapping counts >> as a 'conventional mapping'. > >I'm not clear on something. This doesn't preclude the value of an >rdf:value property from being a typed literal does it? Well, yes, it would, but isn't that appropriate? I guess it might make sense to say aaa rdf:value "10"^^xsd:string . but one might as well omit the type in this case; and it would never make sense to say aaa rdf:value "10"^^xsd:integer . since integers aren't lexical forms. (If this does make sense, what is it supposed to mean?) Pat > >--Frank > > > >-- >Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation >202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 >mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752 -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 15:51:04 UTC