- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:55:39 -0600
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, >patrick.stickler@nokia.com] > > >> It seems to me that what we need, as well as test cases, is an RDF Schema >> for XML Schema datatypes. > >Attached. I did this ages ago as part of the RDF datatyping design >process. It captures the type hierarchy defined by XML Schema part 2 >as illustrated in the attached graphic (from the XML Schema spec). OK, great. Let me suggest the following. I will rewrite the Datatype section of the MT to refer to Dtype interpretations as relative to kinds of 'information' about a set of datatypes. That is normative; but in an informative appendix, I give (the ntriplification of) this as an illustration of the kind of thing that is being talked about. Would that be a good idea? Pat >Patrick > >Attachment converted: Betelgeuse:XSD.rdf 1 (TEXT/ttxt) (0005DEF4) >Attachment converted: Betelgeuse:xsd-type-hierarchy.gif (GIFf/prvw) (0005DEF5) -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 13:55:20 UTC