W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF]

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:55:39 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b10ba12adb105dd@[]>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, 
>>  It seems to me that what we need, as well as test cases, is an RDF Schema
>>  for XML Schema datatypes. 
>Attached. I did this ages ago as part of the RDF datatyping design
>process. It captures the type hierarchy defined by XML Schema part 2
>as illustrated in the attached graphic (from the XML Schema spec).

OK, great. Let me suggest the following. I will rewrite the Datatype 
section of the MT to refer to Dtype interpretations as relative to 
kinds of 'information' about a set of datatypes. That is normative; 
but in an informative appendix, I give (the ntriplification of) this 
as an illustration of the kind of thing that is being talked about. 
Would that be a good idea?


>Attachment converted: Betelgeuse:XSD.rdf 1 (TEXT/ttxt) (0005DEF4)
>Attachment converted: Betelgeuse:xsd-type-hierarchy.gif (GIFf/prvw) (0005DEF5)

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 13:55:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:19 UTC