w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from December 2002 by date

Tuesday, 31 December 2002

Re: Review semantics document (2002-12-13#7) - part 1 Frank Manola
Review semantics document (2002-12-13#7) - part 1 Graham Klyne

Monday, 30 December 2002

Review of Concepts Doc Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 24 December 2002

Re: critical typo in semantics doc pat hayes

Monday, 23 December 2002

New Schema Doc Brian McBride
Re: domain of rdfs:member Dan Brickley
critical typo in semantics doc Brian McBride
domain of rdfs:member Brian McBride

Sunday, 22 December 2002

Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax Brian McBride
concepts LCC now in shadow TR space Brian McBride
Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax Graham Klyne

Saturday, 21 December 2002

Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax Dan Brickley
Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax Jos De_Roo
Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax Graham Klyne
Re: pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax Brian McBride

Friday, 20 December 2002

pressing question about containermembershipproperty syntax pat hayes
some typos in the semantics doc pat hayes
Re: new Primer version for review [was Re: TR structure created] Frank Manola

Thursday, 19 December 2002

Re: reviewing RDF Semantics pat hayes
reviewing RDF Semantics Jos De_Roo
Re: new Primer version for review [was Re: TR structure created] Brian McBride
Re: test cases LCC Brian McBride
Re: new Primer version for review [was Re: TR structure created] Brian McBride
Re: file permissions in RDF CVS Brian McBride
Re: Syntax: positive review Graham Klyne
I18N - Re: test cases LCC Jeremy Carroll
Re: file permissions in RDF CVS Dan Brickley
file permissions in RDF CVS Brian McBride
Syntax: positive review Jeremy Carroll
new Primer version for review [was Re: TR structure created] Frank Manola

Wednesday, 18 December 2002

Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space pat hayes
test cases LCC Jan Grant
Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments Jan Grant
Re: RDF Parser Test cases report for Raptor Jan Grant

Tuesday, 17 December 2002

Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Patrick Stickler
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespaceentailment Patrick Stickler
Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences pat hayes
Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences Dan Connolly
Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences Jeremy Carroll
Re: Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP...] Graham Klyne
Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space Graham Klyne
Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space Graham Klyne
Re: Test cases - ARP report. Jan Grant

Monday, 16 December 2002

Re: Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP...] Dan Connolly
Re: Test cases - ARP report. Dave Beckett
Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space pat hayes
Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space pat hayes
Re: Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP...] pat hayes
Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences Dan Connolly
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Dan Connolly
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Dan Connolly
RDF Parser Test cases report for Raptor Dave Beckett
Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space Graham Klyne
Re: Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP...] Graham Klyne
Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space Graham Klyne
Re: specifying literals Graham Klyne
Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space Brian McBride
Test cases - ARP report. Jeremy Carroll
Re: specifying literals Jeremy Carroll
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Patrick Stickler
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Patrick Stickler
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Patrick Stickler
Re: What are literals? Patrick Stickler
Re: specifying literals Dan Connolly

Sunday, 15 December 2002

Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space pat hayes
Social meanings [was:Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP [was: checked RDF semantics...]] pat hayes
Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP [was: checked RDF semantics...] Graham Klyne
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Graham Klyne

Saturday, 14 December 2002

Re: Help with link? (Was: Re: reminder: outstanding recent actions) Graham Klyne
Re: concepts: strings are plain literals Graham Klyne

Sunday, 15 December 2002

Re: specifying literals Graham Klyne

Saturday, 14 December 2002

Re: XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences Graham Klyne
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment pat hayes
Re: interpretations, time, and HTTP [was: checked RDF semantics...] pat hayes
Semantics doc now in shadow TR space Brian McBride
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Brian McBride
Re: Primer 'latest version' link broken? Dan Connolly
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Dan Connolly
interpretations, time, and HTTP [was: checked RDF semantics...] Dan Connolly
Re: Primer 'latest version' link broken? pat hayes
Re: checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment pat hayes
Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-12-13 Jos De_Roo
specifying literals Dan Connolly

Friday, 13 December 2002

Re: TR structure created Dan Brickley
Re: Primer 'latest version' link broken? Dan Connolly
checked RDF semantics for XSD stuff, couldn't grok namespace entailment Dan Connolly
XML documents are character sequences, not byte sequences Dan Connolly
concepts: strings are plain literals Dan Connolly
TR structure created Brian McBride
Re: fig 2 now fixed in semantics doc.... Brian McBride
Re: Help with link? (Was: Re: reminder: outstanding recent actions) Brian McBride
Re: Primer 'latest version' link broken? Brian McBride
Primer 'latest version' link broken? pat hayes
Help with link? (Was: Re: reminder: outstanding recent actions) pat hayes
RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-12-13 Graham Klyne
Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments Graham Klyne
fig 2 now fixed in semantics doc.... pat hayes
Re: reminder: outstanding recent actions pat hayes
Test case status Jan Grant
Re: Concepts LC candidate Frank Manola
RDF XML Syntax Last candidate 2002-12-13 updated after telcon Dave Beckett
Re: What are literals? pat hayes
Last call candidate (really this time) Jeremy Carroll
Re: semantics doc updated pat hayes
RDF XML Syntax Last Call candidate Dave Beckett
Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments Jan Grant
Re: Can't access test case manifest, test case comments Eric Miller
Can't access test case manifest, test case comments Graham Klyne
Concepts LC candidate Jeremy Carroll
schema question: rdfs:Literal rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource ? Dan Brickley
Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-12-13 Mike Dean
Re: semantics doc updated Jos De_Roo
Re: What are literals? Patrick Stickler
Sun Datatypes Library Patrick Stickler
regrets Aaron Swartz
semantics doc updated pat hayes
Re: action 2002-12-06#11: Last Call Decision Dan Brickley

Thursday, 12 December 2002

Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06 Dan Connolly
Re: action 2002-12-06#11: Last Call Decision Frank Manola
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-12-13 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
reminder: outstanding recent actions Brian McBride
action 2002-12-06#11: Last Call Decision Brian McBride
Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") Frank Manola
Re: What are literals? Brian McBride
Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") Brian McBride
Re: semantics clean-up revision Brian McBride
Re: IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] Brian McBride
Re: What are literals? pat hayes
Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") Frank Manola
Fwd: Poorman issues tracker Brian McBride
Re: Test cases, quick update. Jos De_Roo
Re: IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] Brian McBride
Re: Test cases, quick update. Jan Grant
Re: Test cases, quick update. Graham Klyne
Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") Graham Klyne
Re: Test cases, quick update. Graham Klyne
Re: Test cases, quick update. Jan Grant
Re: Test cases, quick update. Jan Grant
Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") Patrick Stickler
Re: IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] Patrick Stickler
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Literals as Resources Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 11 December 2002

Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") pat hayes
semantics clean-up revision pat hayes
Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") Frank Manola
Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") pat hayes
Re: handling rdf:value pat hayes
Re: IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] Frank Manola
Re: pruning the semantics document (and "meaningless terms") Frank Manola
call for agenda items Brian McBride
Re: handling rdf:value Brian McBride
Re: Test cases, quick update. Jos De_Roo
Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness pat hayes
IsDefinedBy [was: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer] Brian McBride
Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) pat hayes
Re: rdf:li ?? in primer pat hayes
Re: What are literals? pat hayes
Re: Test cases, quick update. Dan Connolly
Re: concepts renumbered Jeremy Carroll
Re: RDF Concepts anchors Jeremy Carroll
Test cases, quick update. Jan Grant
RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) last call WD draft 2002-12-11 Dave Beckett
Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness Brian McBride
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Dan Brickley
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Dan Brickley
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Frank Manola
RDF Concepts anchors Dave Beckett
Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness Patrick Stickler
Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness Brian McBride
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT Brian McBride
Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) Brian McBride
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Jan Grant
Re: rdf:li ?? in primer Brian McBride
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Re: What are literals? Patrick Stickler
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 10 December 2002

Re: What are literals? pat hayes
What are literals? Frank Manola
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT pat hayes
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT Dan Connolly
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT pat hayes
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT Dan Connolly
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Jan Grant
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Frank Manola
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT Dan Connolly
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Frank Manola
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT pat hayes
Re: concepts renumbered Dave Beckett
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Jan Grant
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Jan Grant
Re: handling rdf:value Graham Klyne
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT Patrick Stickler
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT Patrick Stickler
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Re: handling rdf:value Patrick Stickler
Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) Patrick Stickler
Re: rdf:li ?? in primer Patrick Stickler
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT Dan Connolly
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT pat hayes
Re: Bug in MT? pat hayes
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer pat hayes
Re: Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness pat hayes
Re: Question about SHOULD in MT pat hayes
Re: Bug in MT? pat hayes
Re: handling rdf:value pat hayes

Monday, 9 December 2002

Re: 'primary' in primer Frank Manola
Re: 'primary' in primer pat hayes
Re: concepts renumbered Graham Klyne
Re: 'primary' in primer Frank Manola
Re: handling rdf:value Frank Manola
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Frank Manola
concepts renumbered Jeremy Carroll
Re: pruning the semantics document Graham Klyne
Re: handling rdf:value Graham Klyne
Re: Question about rdf:parseType="Collection" syntax Dave Beckett
Re: rdf:li ?? in primer Dave Beckett
Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) pat hayes
Question about rdf:parseType="Collection" syntax Graham Klyne
Re: pruning the semantics document pat hayes
Re: rdf:li ?? in primer pat hayes
Re: handling rdf:value pat hayes
Re: handling rdf:value pat hayes
Re: handling rdf:value pat hayes
Re: handling rdf:value Graham Klyne
Re: pruning the semantics document Dan Connolly
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Dan Brickley
Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Dave Beckett
Re: rdf:li ?? in primer Dave Beckett
"meaningless terms" verbage for Primer Patrick Stickler
Datatypes, datatype classes, URIs and uniqueness Patrick Stickler
Question about SHOULD in MT Patrick Stickler
Bug in MT? Patrick Stickler
Re: handling rdf:value Patrick Stickler
Re: handling rdf:value Patrick Stickler
Re: handling rdf:value Jos De_Roo
RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06) Patrick Stickler
'primary' in primer pat hayes
pruning the semantics document pat hayes
handling rdf:value pat hayes
Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06 Mike Dean

Sunday, 8 December 2002

Re: rdf:li ?? in primer Frank Manola
rdf:li ?? in primer pat hayes
Re: Lbase Dan Brickley
Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06 pat hayes
Lbase pat hayes

Friday, 6 December 2002

Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06 Dave Beckett
trimming fat from semantics doc pat hayes
Re: Semantics of rdf:value Frank Manola
Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Dave Beckett
Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Dave Beckett
RE: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Jeremy Carroll
RE: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Jeremy Carroll
Re: Semantics of rdf:value pat hayes
Re: Semantics of rdf:value Frank Manola
RE: LANG: Proposal to close ontology versioning (ISSUE 5.14) pat hayes
Re: Using third-party vocabularies pat hayes

Thursday, 5 December 2002

Re: Semantics of rdf:value pat hayes
Re: call for agenda items pat hayes
Re: call for agenda items pat hayes
RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) draft 2002-12-05 Dave Beckett
Re: Using third-party vocabularies Graham Klyne
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-12-06 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Dave Beckett
Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Brian McBride
Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Dave Beckett
Semantics of rdf:value Brian McBride
Re: Using third-party vocabularies Brian McBride
Re: call for agenda items Dan Brickley
Re: call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
Re: call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
Re: call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
Re: call for agenda items Dave Beckett
Re: Using third-party vocabularies Graham Klyne
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? Graham Klyne
Re: call for agenda items Graham Klyne
Re: Using third-party vocabularies Brian McBride
Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Brian McBride
Re: call for agenda items Patrick Stickler
call for agenda items Brian McBride
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? Jos De_Roo
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? Patrick Stickler
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 4 December 2002

Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? Frank Manola
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? pat hayes
Re: Using third-party vocabularies Graham Klyne
Re: Using third-party vocabularies Graham Klyne
Re: Using third-party vocabularies pat hayes
Re: RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Dave Beckett
RDF XML Syntax doc proposed changes / issues Dave Beckett
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? Patrick Stickler
Re: semantics doc updated for editorial freeze(?) Patrick Stickler
Re: datatyping Patrick Stickler
Re: Using third-party vocabularies Jeremy Carroll
Re: Using third-party vocabularies Graham Klyne
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? Graham Klyne
Re: datatyping Graham Klyne
Re: Clarifying what datatype entailment support means (Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal) Patrick Stickler
Re: Using third-party vocabularies pat hayes
semantics doc updated for editorial freeze(?) pat hayes
Re: datatyping Jos De_Roo
Re: glossary Jos De_Roo

Tuesday, 3 December 2002

Re: datatyping pat hayes
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDFprimer) pat hayes
Re: datatyping Frank Manola
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDFprimer) Frank Manola
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDFprimer) pat hayes
Re: Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDFprimer) Frank Manola
Should rdf:value have a semantics?? (was: Re: Quick review of RDF primer) pat hayes
deletion. pat hayes
glossary pat hayes
Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF] pat hayes
datatyping pat hayes
Re: Quick review of RDF primer Frank Manola

Sunday, 1 December 2002

Re: Quick review of RDF primer pat hayes
Re: Clarifying what datatype entailment support means (Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal) pat hayes

Monday, 2 December 2002

Concepts renumbering? Jeremy Carroll
Re: xsd:float and xsd:decimal Patrick Stickler
Re: rdfD1 rule and xsd-rules Patrick Stickler
Re: datatype test case (value spaces, rdfs:subClassOf) Patrick Stickler
Re: datatype test case Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 1 December 2002

Re: defn of blank nodes and triples RE: Review of 21-Nov concepts draft, part 3, sect 3-end pat hayes

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 14:03:39 UTC