Saturday, 31 August 2002
Friday, 30 August 2002
- xsi:type not specializable [was: datatypes status
- whoops
- Comments on datatyping draft
- Re: Comments on dt proposal
- Datatypes Draft Questions & Comments
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30
- Comments on dt proposal
Thursday, 29 August 2002
- Re: Proposed agenda item (no global datatyping)
- Re: Proposed agenda item (no global datatyping)
- RE: In the interest of consensus and progress on datatyping...
- RE: RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
- RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
- Re: In the interest of consensus and progress on datatyping...
- RE: Proposed agenda item (no global datatyping)
- In the interest of consensus and progress on datatyping...
- Proposed agenda item (no global datatyping)
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
Wednesday, 28 August 2002
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- Datatypes direction
- Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft
- Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft
- Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft
- RE: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
Tuesday, 27 August 2002
- Re: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
- Re: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- Re: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- namespaces and IRI updates
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- 手錶也可以換現金哦~
Monday, 26 August 2002
- High-level comments on datatyping draft
- Re: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- RE: some review comments on datatype draft
- Re: "processor" in RDF Primer [was: Re: "RDF processor"? "understand"??? ]
- RE: some review comments on datatype draft
- Re: rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements (fwd)
- Re: some review comments on datatype draft
- RE: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-23
- RDF Datatyping Proposal -- Static and Working Revisions
- RE: a review of 'RDF Datatyping'
- RE: some review comments on datatype draft
Friday, 23 August 2002
- Re: rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements (fwd)
- Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft
- Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-23
- ACTION 2002-08-23#7 - "assertion"
- some review comments on datatype draft
- RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-23
- Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft
- Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft
- Pls Review: New Media Type Draft
- "processor" in RDF Primer [was: Re: "RDF processor"? "understand"??? ]
- a review of 'RDF Datatyping'
- Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Re: Minutes of telecon, 2002-08-16
- Re: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- Re: Corrupt Abstract Model doc in archive?
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-16
- Re: "RDF processor"? "understand"??? [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25]
- Re: "RDF processor"? "understand"??? [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25]
- new Primer version
- "RDF processor"? "understand"??? [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25]
- Re: attention editors - ipr disclosure page for rdfcore working group
- Re: attention editors - ipr disclosure page for rdfcore working group
- attention editors - ipr disclosure page for rdfcore working group
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- (aside) literals, literal tokens in a graph
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- Re: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RDF/XML syntax for datatyping, XML Schema validation, and all that jazz...
Thursday, 22 August 2002
- Re: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- Re: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RDF Datatyping Examples -- inline datatype elements
- RDF Datatyping Examples -- rdf:type
- Re: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- date should be 2002-08-23 [was Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25
- RE: Comments on Datatypes almost WD and N-Triples for datatypes (was Re: A Dublin Core with RDF datatypes use case)
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Re: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- Re: Minutes of telecon, 2002-08-16
- Comments on Datatypes almost WD and N-Triples for datatypes (was Re: A Dublin Core with RDF datatypes use case)
- Re: A Dublin Core with RDF datatypes use case
Wednesday, 21 August 2002
- Re: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- regrets for August 23
- Minutes of telecon, 2002-08-16
- A Dublin Core with RDF datatypes use case
- weekly call for agenda items
- priority of dark triples
- Re: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- Re: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
Tuesday, 20 August 2002
- Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
- Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
- Draft: Summary of Responses to request for input on datatypes tradeoff
- Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
- Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
Monday, 19 August 2002
Friday, 16 August 2002
- Re: rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements (fwd)
- link to last version of Datatyping not-quite-a-working-draft published to the WG
- rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements (fwd)
- RE: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- Re: Corrupt Abstract Model doc in archive?
- Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- Minutes of telecon, 2002-08-09
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- RE: datatypes status
- Corrupt Abstract Model doc in archive?
- RE: datatypes status
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- RE: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
Thursday, 15 August 2002
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-16
- regrets
- can't find minutes for 19/Jul telecon
- RE: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- Re: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
Wednesday, 14 August 2002
- Re: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- weekly call for agenda items
- datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- datatypes status
- Re: regrets for the next telecons
- regrets for the next telecons
- Fwd: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review
Tuesday, 13 August 2002
Monday, 12 August 2002
- RE: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- Re: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- Argh! No more programming language analogies please! RE: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- RE: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- RE: The latest proposal ++--
- URIs so far (Re: Justification for new node type)
- RE: Justification for new node type
- RE: The latest proposal ++--
- Re: Java global implicit typing
Sunday, 11 August 2002
Saturday, 10 August 2002
Friday, 9 August 2002
- RE: The latest proposal ++--
- RE: Justification for new node type
- The latest proposal ++--
- Re: Justification for new node type
- RE: RDF datatyping: retro chic / progress report
- RDF datatyping: retro chic / progress report
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: Justification for new node type
- Steps to be taken
- Justification for new node type
- additional context for todays discussions
- Re: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
Thursday, 8 August 2002
- RE: new datatyping proposal consistent with OMG's MOF
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: new datatyping proposal
Friday, 9 August 2002
Wednesday, 7 August 2002
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
Friday, 9 August 2002
- Re: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- Agenda for RDF Core Teleconference 2002-08-09 (datatypes, # | /)
Thursday, 8 August 2002
- new datatyping proposal consistent with OMG's MOF
- Re: new datatyping proposal
- Re: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- Re: new datatyping proposal
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- Re: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: new datatyping proposal
- RE: new datatyping proposal
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- new datatyping proposal
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- Re: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: 2002-08-05
- XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
Wednesday, 7 August 2002
- Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: 2002-08-05
- Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: 2002-08-05
- Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Re: type test case
- RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: 2002-08-05
- Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- weekly call for agenda items
- Re: Test cases schema document and test: namespace URI
- Test cases schema document and test: namespace URI
- RE: type test case
- Re: type test case
- Re: datatype status update (was Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal))
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: type test case
- Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: xsi:type test case
- N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- RE: xsi:type test case
Tuesday, 6 August 2002
- Re: xsi:type test case
- Re: xsi:type test case
- regrets for next two weeks
- datatype status update (was Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal))
- Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- Re: RDF abstract model document - treatment of graphs
- Re: toward a minimal datatypes spec: hmm...
- Re: toward a minimal datatypes spec: hmm...
- Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- Re: RDF abstract model document - treatment of graphs
Saturday, 3 August 2002
- Re: what triple bloat? [was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)]
- Re: what triple bloat? [was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)]
Friday, 2 August 2002
- what triple bloat? [was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)]
- Re: toward a minimal datatypes spec: hmm...
- New document: summary of required changes
- RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)
- Regrets for next three weeks
- xsi:type test case
- Re: toward a minimal datatypes spec: hmm...
- New document feedback/review/baises...
- Re: New document: revised version for WG review)
- Re: comments on http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/Current/Overview.htm - mistake re media type
- Re: comments on http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/Current/Overview.htm - mistake re media type
- Re: toward a minimal datatypes spec: hmm...
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)
- Re: new document comments
- Re: New document: revised version for WG review)
- comments on http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/Current/Overview.htm - mistake re media type
- Re: new document comments
- Re: new document comments
- Re: xml.com piece on XML Schema datatypes (no rationals :-{)
- Re: toward a minimal datatypes spec: hmm...
- LBase: new version available, plus pre-TR work (status/abstract)
- Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- new document comments
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)
- Web Ontology Working Drafts Available for Review (fwd)
- toward a minimal datatypes spec: hmm...
- Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)
- Attention: Please review (was Re: New document: revised version for WG review)