Re: Issue rdfms-rdf-names-use

Hi Dave,

[...]

>
>Note the namespace isn't the one for the syntax:
>   http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
>but another one:
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax


Ahh - that explains something in his emails that I missed the significance 
of.  I think he perceives the namespace quoted in para 192 as a simple 
error.  He believes that the intent is that it should read:

   http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#

I just checked the errata and no correction is there.

[...]


>However, I feel we shouldn't keep Para 196 around on the grounds of
>insufficient use and (correct) implementation.  This the first
>attempt at use I've ever seen and I don't remember seeing any parser
>that implemented this.


Is there a proposal covering this?

Brian