RE: Answer to the question: What is a "value" to RDF

[...]
>
> Am I the only one to see a conflict here? (though that may
> not be so surprising ;-)
>
> I.e. what is the interpretation of the following knowledge:
>
>    x s:age "P12Y" .
>    s:age rdfs:range xsd:duration .
>    s:age rdfs:subPropertyOf xsd:duration .
>
> According to the S proposal, either range or subproperty
> relations can define type. Which is it going to be? Both?!


I think that in the S-idiom it is (just)

  x s:age [ xsd:duration "P12Y"] .

and
  s:age rdfs:range [ is rdfs:domain of xsd:duration ] .

and
  xsd:duration rdfs:range [ is rdfs:domain of xsd:string ] .

(datatypes in the S-idiom are properties, that S-imple ;-)

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 16:48:28 UTC