RE: datatypes and MT (#rdfms-graph)

At 12:40 PM 11/15/01 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:

> > ...The other proposals (S, DC and oldX=URV) don't need
> > this complication, however, since they can assume tidiness on literal
> > nodes as well as urirefs.
>
>Can someone please point me to the most concise, prose definition
>of tidiness as it relates to the graph?

http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/

Section 0.2, final paragraph.

#g
--


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
       __
      /\ \
     /  \ \
    / /\ \ \
   / / /\ \ \
  / / /__\_\ \
/ / /________\
\/___________/

Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 09:52:49 UTC