- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:36:18 -0600
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> >How about the RDF/XML representations for the other >proposals? > >Just because a proposal is "compatible with" the present >RDF/XML serialization doesn't mean that its representatation >is palatable. > >Here's a stab at the examples provided in Pat's mental dump >re-expressed in RDF/XML as best as I can figure. Thanks, I couldn't have done this. >If anyone >thinks there's a better way for a given case, please suggest it. I don't think the P++ option is expressible in RDF/XML, since it requires literals to be subjects. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 22:39:01 UTC