RE: DATATYPES: mental dump.

>
>How about the RDF/XML representations for the other
>proposals?
>
>Just because a proposal is "compatible with" the present
>RDF/XML serialization doesn't mean that its representatation
>is palatable.
>
>Here's a stab at the examples provided in Pat's mental dump
>re-expressed in RDF/XML as best as I can figure.

Thanks, I couldn't have done this.

>If anyone
>thinks there's a better way for a given case, please suggest it.

I don't think the P++ option is expressible in RDF/XML, since it 
requires literals to be subjects.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 22:39:01 UTC