- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 20:25:27 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Issue > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-boolean-valued-properties > >requests a standard way to represent boolean valued properties and >suggests the definition of rdf:is and rdf:isNot properties to meet >this need. > >Propose that as schema data types define a boolean data value, this >issue be merged with: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-xml-schema-datatypes Hmm, not sure I agree. That is one way to do it, but another would be to say that a boolean-valued property should be identified with a class; the property is true of aaa iff aaa is in the class. The example of ChocolateLover certainly suggests this to me. Then rdf:is would be rdf:type. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 21:25:23 UTC