Re: Correction and Comments ( was RE: DATATYPES: mental dump.)

>Please have a look at my X proposal summary, which includes
>alot more than the use of URVs (which in fact are a minimal
>component).

Indeed it does, so much more that it seems to me to be clearly out of 
scope for this discussion and even for the entire WG. You seem to be 
proposing a complete redesign of the entire RDF data model, graph 
syntax, semantics and just about everything else. It seems like an 
awful lot to swallow just to get datatyping right.

But just to keep the terminology straight, this clearly isn't what I 
was calling the X proposal, so  just to keep our wires uncrossed in 
the various emails, let us re-christen the simpler idea the URV 
proposal.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 20:29:20 UTC