- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:25:53 +0200
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, melnik@db.stanford.edu, phayes@ai.uwf.edu
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Thus, given > > _X --p:weightKg--> "14" > ... > > The value "14" in the first two cases are interpreted > as strings ... Or perhaps a literal that has no type whatsoever attached to it should default to rdfs:Literal. I guess we don't want to assert any XML Schema interpretation by RDF itself (though an application may treat all untyped literals as xsd:string values). Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 16:26:12 UTC