- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:36:33 -0600
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- CC: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Frank Manola wrote: [...] > My current understanding is that Ntriples was defined only as a > simplified notation to express test cases (it's only defined in the Text > Case document); however, there may be an expanded role for it now. I > use it in the Primer because it's a straightforward linearization of > the graph structure, which is the *model* I'm trying to convey. whoa... a model is an interpretation that satisfies a formula/document (or set of formulas/documents). ntriples isn't a representation of a model. cf Re: RDF Issue rdfms-logical-terminololgy From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org) Date: Mon, Nov 12 2001 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001OctDec/0267.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 11:39:37 UTC