- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:24:39 +0200
- To: fmanola@mitre.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Frank, I thought the draft on the data model section was very well written, and I'm happy to see the clear discussion about URLs vs. URIs (though you go on to use HTTP URLs for abstract concepts anyway ;-) I am concerned though that the example serializations are in NTriples and not RDF/XML. Have we decided to make NTriples an "officially sanctioned and required" serialization? Will all RDF parsers have to eat NTriples to be fully conformant to the spec? Also, what is the relation between nodeIDs in NTriples to some representation in RDF/XML. We can't use rdf:ID, since that maps to a URI in the presence of an xml:base definition. How does one achieve the same instance-specific-only nodeID representations in RDF/XML? Cheers, Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Frank Manola [mailto:fmanola@mitre.org] > Sent: 09 November, 2001 04:25 > To: rdf core > Cc: Frank Manola > Subject: PRIMER: new draft data model section > > > I've tried to address most of the comments I've received (in > some cases > I addressed them by ignoring them, but I hope I did it deliberately!) > There are some inline editorial comments, notes, and other > stuff to be > fixed. Sorry I didn't get this out sooner (and more > completely); I'm > still recovering from whatever bug hit me last week (if you > hear snoring > tomorrow morning on the telecon, it'll probably be me). > > > --Frank > > > -- > Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation > 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 > mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875 >
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 03:24:46 UTC