W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

RE: PRIMER: new draft data model section

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:24:39 +0200
Message-ID: <2BF0AD29BC31FE46B78877321144043114C082@trebe003.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: fmanola@mitre.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org


I thought the draft on the data model section was
very well written, and I'm happy to see the clear
discussion about URLs vs. URIs (though you go on
to use HTTP URLs for abstract concepts anyway ;-)

I am concerned though that the example serializations
are in NTriples and not RDF/XML. Have we decided to
make NTriples an "officially sanctioned and required"
serialization? Will all RDF parsers have to eat
NTriples to be fully conformant to the spec?

Also, what is the relation between nodeIDs in NTriples
to some representation in RDF/XML. We can't use rdf:ID,
since that maps to a URI in the presence of an xml:base

How does one achieve the same instance-specific-only
nodeID representations in RDF/XML?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Frank Manola [mailto:fmanola@mitre.org]
> Sent: 09 November, 2001 04:25
> To: rdf core
> Cc: Frank Manola
> Subject: PRIMER: new draft data model section
> I've tried to address most of the comments I've received (in 
> some cases 
> I addressed them by ignoring them, but I hope I did it deliberately!) 
> There are some inline editorial comments, notes, and other 
> stuff to be 
> fixed.  Sorry I didn't get this out sooner (and more 
> completely);  I'm 
> still recovering from whatever bug hit me last week (if you 
> hear snoring 
> tomorrow morning on the telecon, it'll probably be me).
> --Frank
> -- 
> Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
> 202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
> mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 03:24:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:06 UTC