- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 17:42:17 +0000
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- CC: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: [...] > > The reason why a range definition cannot be descriptive > of non-locally typed literals, is because lexical form > is specific to a given data type, and the binding of > a value to a given property may occur by various means > and one can end up with a literal value having a lexical > form that is not compatible with the data type of the > property. Please can we have at least one concrete example, analysed for each of the three proposals S, P, X. Brian
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 12:47:12 UTC