- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 09:24:55 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote: > > Pat Hayes wrote: > > >> I'm being thick again. Can someone explain how this works for > >> resources which are neither properties nor classes. > > > > > > It doesn't, relax. I have this annoying habit of reacting to emails when > > I read them, which sometimes misses things that have been said since. > > No problem. However to take note of Aaron's point, propose instead: > > Propose postpone > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris > > on the grounds that the issue of defining an equivalence mechanism for arbritary > URI's is out of scope of the WG's current charter. The WG notes however, that > by allowing cycles in rdfs:subPropertyOf and rdfs:subClassOf RDF Schema provides > a related mechanism for properties and classes. seconded, on the condition that a primer editor takes an action to include this in a primer. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 10:25:45 UTC