Re: Proposed issue resolutions

>I'm being thick again.  Can someone explain how this works for 
>resources which are neither properties nor classes.

It doesn't, relax. I have this annoying habit of reacting to emails 
when I read them, which sometimes misses things that have been said 
since.

>Do I need to take this off the quick close list?

No.


>Brian
>
>
>Pat Hayes wrote:
>
>>>On Monday, November 5, 2001, at 12:12  PM, Brian McBride wrote:
>>>
>>>>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
>>>>
>>>>on the grounds that it is out of scope of the charter.
>>>
>>>
>>>Umm, it was my understanding that subPropertyOf allowed one to 
>>>define two resources as equivalent by doing:
>>>
>>>foo rdfs:subPropertyOf bar .
>>>bar rdfs:subPropertyOf foo .
>>>
>>>Is this not true?
>>
>>
>>Well caught, Aaron.
>>
>>Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
phayes@ai.uwf.edu 
http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes

Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2001 22:19:16 UTC