Re: Proposed issue resolutions

Hi Aaron,

Aaron Swartz wrote:

> On Monday, November 5, 2001, at 12:12  PM, Brian McBride wrote:
> 
>>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
>>
>> on the grounds that it is out of scope of the charter.
> 
> 
> Umm, it was my understanding that subPropertyOf allowed one to define 
> two resources as equivalent by doing:
> 
> foo rdfs:subPropertyOf bar .
> bar rdfs:subPropertyOf foo .
> 
> Is this not true?


Well, its true for Properties,  and subClassOf will do it for classes.  I didn't 
think it could do it for arbritary resources though, without implying a type for 
them.

Brian

Received on Monday, 5 November 2001 13:02:46 UTC