- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 11:21:42 +0000
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: [...] > I really don't see an issue here. Allowing literals as subjects in the > abstract graph, and in N-triples, doesn't change the RDF/XML syntax as > defined. Furthermore, if we use Pat's MT work in conjunction with RDFS > closures, we can explain how to apply XML data types with the existing > RDF/XML syntax (even if we can't express the graphs that result from > RDFS closure in the existing RDF/XML syntax). Oops, am I missing something. Graham, how should I write: "subject" <rdf:type> <rdf:Literal> . in RDF/XML? Brian
Received on Friday, 2 November 2001 06:26:32 UTC