- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:18:17 -0600
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Monday, October 29, 2001, at 09:37 AM, Dave Beckett wrote:
> The issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value
> is recorded as:
> Suggestion that the rdf:value property be replaced by rdf:toString.
I'm not sure where you got this, but I don't see this at the URL. I see:
It is suggested that the property rdf:value
represents a mapping from a resource to textual
representation of that resource. If for example,
the resource represents the number 10, then the
value of the rdf:value property would be the
string "10".
I think this is very much in scope.
> So I propose that:
> We reject this suggestion as an unnecessary change
I assume this refers to the renaming bit. I can go along with
that, but not the rest of the suggestion.
> ACTION the model theory editor (Pat) to explain what rdf:value means
> ACTION the primer editor (Eric) to ensure that a description of
> how to use rdf:value is included.
>
> Are there any objections to this form of words?
Sounds good.
--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2001 18:18:12 UTC