- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 11:26:57 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 06:25:49PM +0100, Brian McBride wrote: > Art Barstow wrote: > > I am also willing to take ownership of the document > > Thanks for volunteering Art. The only observation I have here is that if > we are going to update two docs in sync, i.e the issues list and the > resolved issues doc proposed, then it might be easier if both were done > by one person. I think the sync problem could be a little more complicated because the resolution of some issues will result in changes to the errata document and other resolutions will result in changes to the resolved issues doc. Depending on what is considered acceptable for an errata (e.g. test cases?), both the errata and the resolved issues doc could be updated. For example, the ns-prefix-resolution could be handled this way: o the issue's Currently field [in the open issues doc] is changed to something like "closed - see errata and resolution" and links to the item in the errata and closed issues doc are included o the issue is added to the errata; the errata contains a link to the open issue doc and a link to the resolved issues doc o the issue is added to the closed issues doc; this issue will include pointers to the test cases and pointers to the discussion in the w3c-rdfcore-wg archive. Hmmm. Would this be going overboard?
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2001 11:28:03 UTC