- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:26:09 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, timbl@w3.org, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > Actually, that smiley-point is well-made: this testing format > shouldn't depend on all the RDF/n3 specs, code, and > tutorials, which are in flux... Yes [...] > > We've got terms of the form > _:name for "anonymous" terms > <absURIref> for URIs > "lskdjf" for string literals. How would we handle relative URI's, e.g.: <rdf:Description rdf:ID='foo'/> Brian
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2001 05:26:58 UTC