- From: Frank Boumphrey <bckman@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 21:52:46 -0400
- To: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@upclink.com>, "RDFCore Working Group" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
<aaron>Also, why do the forms use POST instead of GET?</aaron> view source shows (at line 70): <form method="GET" action="/2000/06/webdata/xslt"> For my own enlightenment, is there any reason why 'GET' is preferred in RDF?. I always use 'POST' in my hacking. Frank ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@upclink.com> To: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>; "RDFCore Working Group" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 5:07 PM Subject: Re: RDF Namespace parser > Frank Boumphrey <bckman@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > It looks for the namespace of the files elements and attributes , and > > tables them. If needed it will convert uncolonized attributes, and > > unqualified namespace declarations into quaified declarations, and > > colonized atts. (It does not deal with empty unqualified namespace > > declarations (i.e. xmlns="") yet.). I have not yet tested it on any > > 'torture' files, (Can any one give be the URL of such a file?), but it > > should work on any smaller files. > > For something more RDF-centric, Dan Connolly has built an XSLT file to fix > broken RDF files: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/04rs22/fixAttrs.xsl > > You can use it with the W3C's online XSLT service. An example is: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/06/webdata/xslt?xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2001/ 04rs22 > /fixAttrs.xsl&xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2001/04rs22/confusedPrefixes.r df > > But replace the confusedPrefixes file with any file available over HTTP to > fix it. > > Dan, would you mind putting up an HTML form on the syntax hacking page for > people to use? Also, why do the forms use POST instead of GET? > > -- > Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| The Info Network > <http://www.aaronsw.com> | <http://theinfo.org> > AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to be > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2001 21:40:37 UTC