- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:37:12 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dave Beckett wrote: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion > > Previous threads can be followed from > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0166.html > > following the actions recorded in the meeting at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/att-0195/01-rdfc25May.html#N77 Er... thanks for the details about which parts of the spec are affected, but the action item is also about test cases; I don't see any here; you're still getting those together, right? > I have amended the previous resolutions (#3-#5,#6 deleted in above) > to give the following with new #3-#9 expanding on grammar and > document changes. Please let's not wordsmith this resolution stuff any more. As a group, we made the relevant decisions and we're done with this, provided the associated actions get done presently; i.e. provided you provide test cases and BrianM links them from the errata document, as we agreed last Fri. Brian, the errata http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/errata still shows Updated $Date: 2001/03/05 14:36:19 $ Did EricM get you what you need to write to it? [...] > 3. The updated grammar productions required for #2 in > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#grammar > are as follows. > > [6.6] idAttr ::= ' rdf:ID="' IDsymbol '"' > > [6.7] aboutAttr ::= ' rdf:about="' URI-reference '"' [...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2001 13:37:20 UTC