- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:37:35 -0500
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Jan Grant wrote: > > On Wed, 30 May 2001, Brian McBride wrote: > > > Jan, > > > > Thanks for this. It could be very useful. > > > > How about sending it to the list as an html attachement and then we'll > > have it in the archive to refer to. > > Stunningly good idea. Apologies for size, here they are. Schema to > follow. I find great big attachments to be something of a burden... your mention of "apologies" suggests you do too... W3C has a mailing list set up *just* so you can mail stuff* there to get an archive pointer: www-archive@w3.org (archived at http://www.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/ ) so my preference would be: send big attachments to www-archive and then send notice (including a pointer) to w3c-rdfcore-wg. That's my preference, but I know of some folks that actually prefer to receive copies of documents rather than pointers, so I leave it to the chairs and/or staff contacts to decide which policy, if any, best serves the needs of the group. *stuff related to W3C work, that is. It only accepts mail from folks that are subscribed to some W3C mailing list. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2001 12:38:44 UTC