- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 13:40:15 -0400
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 05:44:22PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > > I think rather: > > [6.19] Qname ::= NSprefix ':' name > > i.e. compulsory prefix, but I'll work on a full list of grammar changes Yes, thanks Dave - that's what I meant. > > I would not expect these type of changes to be placed in the > > errata. As a convenience to the WG (and the RDF community), I > > think it would be useful to consolidate these type of changes > > in a document as I have described. All changes in that document > > would be subject to some type of "it's not over till it's over" > > provisio as I stated previously. > > I'm also uncomfortable calling this errata, but would prefer to have > some statement in the errata for RDF M&S, Schema pointing at the > resolved issues document - some words needed here saying "watch out, > here are the changes subsequent to this document, changing the syntax > and model". The resolved issues document could then give more details > on the state of proposed changes for those documents. That all seems OK with me. Art ---
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2001 13:40:23 UTC