- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:21:25 +0100
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 09:49 AM 5/25/01 +0100, Jan Grant wrote:
>Perhaps we might stick with a simple grammar for serialised RDF and
>include something to the effect:
>
> "any stream of XML tokens that is equivalent to this
> serialisation (wrt. {a subset of the XML infoset})
> is also a valid serialised form, and should be
> interpreted equivalently."
I'd not object to that. My suggestion was for the Infoset version to be
the main reference, and an informational grammar be included as an appendix.
#g
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 13:26:36 UTC