- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:28:09 -0400
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:06:27AM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: > > ISSUE: I hereby call for an issue on the wording of deprecation and > backwards compatibility so we don't have to conflate it or get > diverted from addressing issues. I just wanted like to second this good idea! I would also like the chairs to clarify what (if any) restrictions the WG has wrt to syntax changes. For example, is there is a blanket statement that can be applied to all issues? The only reference I found in the WG charter: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCoreWGCharter regarding backwards compatibility is: [[ Backwards compatibility with existing RDF applications is a priority for the RDF Core Working Group. ]] so I'd also like to know - what does this really mean? Art ---
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 09:28:13 UTC