- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 14:54:09 -0700
- To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- CC: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org> wrote: >> <rdf:Description> >> <propName rdf:ID="foo" rdf:resource="bar"/> >> </rdf:Description> >> >> would also assign foo the the reification of the statement. > > Would you please enumerate the triples you would > expect from the above RDF if it was legal (and doing so > in Subject, Pred, Object format ala SiRPAC would be much > appreciated)? Sorry for not including this -- I've done it several times before (but not in SiRPAC style) so I was getting tired, but here it is: triple(r('#genid1'),r('http://rdf.example.org/#propName'),r('bar')) . triple(r('#foo'),r('http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#subject'),r(' #genid1')) . triple(r('#foo'),r('http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#predicate'),r ('http://rdf.example.org/#propName')) . triple(r('#foo'),r('http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#object'),r('b ar')) . > Also, what triples would you expect if the RDF was: > > <rdf:Description about="some_resource"> > <propName rdf:ID="foo" rdf:resource="bar"/> > </rdf:Description> The same as above except "some_resource" replaces "#genid1". This kind of output is very much in line with what would happen with something like: <rdf:Description> <propName rdf:ID="foo">bar</propName> </rdf:Description> and the same with an rdf:about. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2001 17:54:16 UTC