Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr from Brian McBride on 2001-05-22 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from May 2001)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:30:31 +0100
To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
CC: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <3B0A8617.C215D457@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Art Barstow wrote:

> It seems like the intent of the idRefAttr (in the last option of
> [6.12]) is to make it illegal for an empty propertyElt to contain
> both an id and resource attribute.

I think thats exactly right Art.

The question is whether the spec *should* allow:

  <rdf:Description>
    <foo:bar rdf:resource="..." rdf:ID=",,,"/>
  </rdf:Description>

not whether it does allow it.

What I've seen so far is an answer that says the spec doesn't allow it.
I feel that doesn't fully answer the issue raised.

Brian

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2001 11:31:06 UTC