- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 12:50:17 +0100 (BST)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Dan Connolly wrote: > Jan Grant wrote: > > > > Ok, this should be a quick one. > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements > > indeed. > > [...] > >The question is what to do with: > > > > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > > xmlns:random="http://random.ioctl.org/#"> > > > > <random:Objecttype> > > <random:someProperty/> > > </random:Objecttype> > > > > </rdf:RDF> > > From most XML processing APIs, this is indistinguishable > from > <random:someProperty></random:someProperty> > > That's clearly an empty literal, no? That's my opinion too; just wanted to make explicit the suggestions for coping with it without sounding too partisan. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Generalisation is never appropriate.
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2001 07:52:15 UTC