- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 00:44:09 +0100
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
this is very nice, http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/cwm.py now produces:
<!-- Processed by Id: cwm.py,v 1.38 2001/05/09 20:11:39 timbl Exp -->
<!-- using base http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/01-rdf-ns-prefix-confusion.rd
f--># Begining output.
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/01-rdf-ns-prefix-confusion.rdf#"
xmlns:foo="http://example.org/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/01-rdf-ns-prefix-
confusion.rdf#node">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://example.org/bar"/>
<foo:blah>value</foo:blah>
<foo:prop rdf:resource="http://somewhere.example.org/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com@w3.org on 05/09/2001 07:44:46 PM
Sent by: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Issue
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion
> Checking some deployed code for what is done with example above:
>
> repat - dies: "unknown or out of context rdf attribute: blah"
> rapier - ignores it
> SiRPAC - generates a statement where the predicate is 'blah' -
> i.e. not an absolute URI, could be considered a relative one I
> suppose. [both SiRPACs]
> VRP 1.4 - forms property URI http://example.org/blah i.e. takes 2b)
(after putting that testcase before our firewall) we found Jena giving:
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#'
xmlns:RDFNsId1='http://example.org/' >
<rdf:Description rdf:about='http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/rdf-ns-prefix-confu
sion.rdfnode'>
<rdf:type rdf:resource='http://example.org/bar'/>
<RDFNsId1:blah>value</RDFNsId1:blah>
<RDFNsId1:prop rdf:resource='http://somewhere.example.org/'/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and cwm giving:
<!-- Processed by Id: cwm.py,v 1.32 2001/04/05 21:33:55 timbl Exp -->
<!-- using base http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion.rdf--
># Begining output.
<rdf:RDF xmlns:foo="http://example.org/"
xmlns="http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion.rdf#"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="#node">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="../../example.org/bar"/>
<foo:blah>value</foo:blah>
<foo:prop rdf:resource="../../somewhere.example.org/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
so they are both 2b but there is a difference in their rdf:about=...
and also cwm gives some (strange?) rdf:resource="../../example.org/bar"
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
ps test cases (even very simple ones) are so helpful
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2001 18:44:26 UTC