- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 00:44:09 +0100
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
this is very nice, http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/cwm.py now produces: <!-- Processed by Id: cwm.py,v 1.38 2001/05/09 20:11:39 timbl Exp --> <!-- using base http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/01-rdf-ns-prefix-confusion.rd f--># Begining output. <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/01-rdf-ns-prefix-confusion.rdf#" xmlns:foo="http://example.org/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/01-rdf-ns-prefix- confusion.rdf#node"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://example.org/bar"/> <foo:blah>value</foo:blah> <foo:prop rdf:resource="http://somewhere.example.org/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com@w3.org on 05/09/2001 07:44:46 PM Sent by: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion > Checking some deployed code for what is done with example above: > > repat - dies: "unknown or out of context rdf attribute: blah" > rapier - ignores it > SiRPAC - generates a statement where the predicate is 'blah' - > i.e. not an absolute URI, could be considered a relative one I > suppose. [both SiRPACs] > VRP 1.4 - forms property URI http://example.org/blah i.e. takes 2b) (after putting that testcase before our firewall) we found Jena giving: <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf='http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#' xmlns:RDFNsId1='http://example.org/' > <rdf:Description rdf:about='http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/rdf-ns-prefix-confu sion.rdfnode'> <rdf:type rdf:resource='http://example.org/bar'/> <RDFNsId1:blah>value</RDFNsId1:blah> <RDFNsId1:prop rdf:resource='http://somewhere.example.org/'/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and cwm giving: <!-- Processed by Id: cwm.py,v 1.32 2001/04/05 21:33:55 timbl Exp --> <!-- using base http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion.rdf-- ># Begining output. <rdf:RDF xmlns:foo="http://example.org/" xmlns="http://vam969.roam.agfa.be/rdf/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion.rdf#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> <rdf:Description rdf:about="#node"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="../../example.org/bar"/> <foo:blah>value</foo:blah> <foo:prop rdf:resource="../../somewhere.example.org/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- so they are both 2b but there is a difference in their rdf:about=... and also cwm gives some (strange?) rdf:resource="../../example.org/bar" -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ ps test cases (even very simple ones) are so helpful
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2001 18:44:26 UTC