Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs

At 09:40 AM 5/3/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>Reading the original mail mesage that raised the issue, the reason why an RDF
>mime type is thought to  be required is to support content 
>negotiation.  Do you
>believe that this is the only motivation, or are there others that we should
>capture?  The current characterization of the issue in the IL document isn't
>very clear.  Would you be able to write some words describing the problem that
>could be included there?

Speculating... it might also be that a MIME type for RDF needs to be stated 
so that fragment identifiers can be interpreted (though just specifying 
application/xml would be enought for that purpose).

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 12:00:47 UTC