w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from May 2001 by date

Friday, 1 June 2001

• Re: rdfc25May.n3 testcase Dan Connolly
• Re: rdfc25May.n3 testcase Aaron Swartz

Thursday, 31 May 2001

• Re: rdfc25May.n3 testcase Dan Connolly
• Re: Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output(uri/node/resource/entity too) Jan Grant
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output(uri/node/resource/entity too) Dan Connolly
• Re: Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-06-01 Teleconference Agenda Dan Connolly
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output(uri/node/resource/entity too) Aaron Swartz
• Re: Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues Art Barstow
• Re: Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dan Connolly
• RDFCore WG 2001-06-01 Teleconference Agenda Brian McBride
• Seeking grammars expressed in XML Info Set [Was: Re: Issue .../#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr] Art Barstow
• Bundle of Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output (uri/node/resource/entity too) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output(uri/node/resource/entity too) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output(uri/node/resource/entity too) Brian McBride
• Re: Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Brian McBride
• Re: namespace evolution [was: Issue prefix-confusion] Frank Boumphrey
• POST vs. GET (was: RDF Namespace parser) Aaron Swartz
• Re: RDF Namespace parser Aaron Swartz
• namespace evolution [was: Issue prefix-confusion] Dan Connolly
• Regrets for tele-confab. this Friday. Frank Boumphrey
• Re: RDF Namespace parser Frank Boumphrey
• Re: RDF Namespace parser Frank Boumphrey
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Frank Boumphrey

Wednesday, 30 May 2001

• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF Namespace parser Dan Connolly
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output(uri/node/resource/entity too) Dan Connolly
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output (uri/node/resource/entity too) Aaron Swartz
• Re: RDF Namespace parser Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-abouteachprefix Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Aaron Swartz
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output (uri/node/resource/entity too) Aaron Swartz
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Brian McBride
• Re: Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Brian McBride
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Frank Boumphrey
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Art Barstow
• RDF Namespace parser Frank Boumphrey
• Re: www-archive for big attachments [was: schema given the (Pnnn) treatment too...] Frank Manola
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dan Connolly
• Re: Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues Brian McBride
• Re: rdfc25May.n3 testcase jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output (uri/node/resource/entity too) Brian McBride
• www-archive for big attachments [was: schema given the (Pnnn) treatment too...] Dan Connolly
• Re: Agenda Items Aaron Swartz
• Re: schema given the (Pnnn) treatment too... Jan Grant
• RDF schema with paragraph numbers Jan Grant
• Re: schema given the (Pnnn) treatment too... Brian McBride
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Agenda Items Brian McBride
• Re: Minutes 25 May for review (and: fun with RDF for meeting records) Brian McBride
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: rdfc25May.n3 testcase Dan Connolly
• Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• rdfc25May.n3 testcase jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Martyn Horner
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output (uri/node/resource/entity too) Jan Grant
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-abouteachprefix Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output (uri/node/resource/entity too) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Tuesday, 29 May 2001

• Re: Semantic Web Meeting Records Massimo Marchiori
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output (uri/node/resource/entity too) Dan Connolly
• Re: Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues Art Barstow
• Re: action item on reification Dave Beckett
• Re: Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues Dave Beckett
• Re: minor correction to May 25 minutes Brian McBride
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Brian McBride
• minor correction to May 25 minutes Ron Daniel
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output (uri/node/resource/entity too) Jan Grant
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Jan Grant
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Frank Boumphrey

Sunday, 27 May 2001

• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Aaron Swartz
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Dan Connolly
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Aaron Swartz
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Dan Connolly
• Re: action item on reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: action item on reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: action item on reification Aaron Swartz
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 26 May 2001

• Re: Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues Art Barstow
• Re: Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues Art Barstow
• Re: Minutes 25 May for review (and: fun with RDF for meeting records) Graham Klyne
• Re: Communication with IG Graham Klyne
• Re: action item on reification Graham Klyne

Friday, 25 May 2001

• Re: Communication with IG Aaron Swartz
• Re: action item on reification Aaron Swartz
• Re: Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues Aaron Swartz
• Re: Minutes 25 May for review (and: fun with RDF for meeting records) Mike Dean
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Dan Connolly
• Re: Test cases: format of input and output Dan Connolly
• Re: Backwards compatibility [Was: Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion] Dan Connolly
• Semantic Web Meeting Records Dan Connolly
• Minutes 25 May for review (and: fun with RDF for meeting records) Dan Connolly
• General syntax: infoset of BNF? Graham Klyne
• Re: action item on reification Graham Klyne
• Re: action item on reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: action item on reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Activing more issues Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM
• schema given the (Pnnn) treatment too... Jan Grant
• Test cases: format of input and output Jan Grant
• M+S marked up with paragraph numbers... Jan Grant
• Backwards compatibility [Was: Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion] Art Barstow
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Brian McBride
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Brian McBride
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Jan Grant
• Re: action item on reification Dave Beckett
• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-05-25 Teleconference Agenda Dan Brickley
• Re: action item on reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Thursday, 24 May 2001

• Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues Art Barstow
• Re: Issue #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Art Barstow
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Art Barstow
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dan Connolly
• Re: action item on reification Graham Klyne
• Re: action item on reification Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Graham Klyne
• RDFCore WG 2001-05-25 Teleconference Agenda Brian McBride
• RDFCore WG 2001-05018 Teleconference Agenda Brian McBride
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• EC logic--correction Frank Manola
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Dave Beckett
• Re: XML infoset conformance -- new issue? Art Barstow
• Re: Activating more issues Brian McBride
• Re: XML infoset conformance -- new issue? Brian McBride
• Re: action item on reification Frank Manola
• Re: action item on reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: action item on reification jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Wednesday, 23 May 2001

• Re: action item on reification Frank Manola
• Re: Issue #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Aaron Swartz
• Re: action item on reification Dan Brickley
• Re: Activating more issues Aaron Swartz
• regrets for next friday's RDFCore telecon jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• action item on reification Frank Manola
• Activating more issues Brian McBride
• Call for Agenda Items Brian McBride
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett

Tuesday, 22 May 2001

• Re: Issue #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Aaron Swartz
• Re: XML infoset conformance -- new issue? Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Brian McBride
• Re: action item on clarification: first installment Graham Klyne
• Model theory for programmers? Graham Klyne
• XML infoset conformance -- new issue? Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Art Barstow

Monday, 21 May 2001

• action item on clarification: first installment Frank Manola
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semantics Brian McBride
• Re: Containers and the RDF Model (A3) Dan Brickley
• Re: Containers and the RDF Model (A3) Brian McBride
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Brian McBride
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements Jan Grant
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements Art Barstow
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements Jan Grant
• probable regrets Ron Daniel

Saturday, 19 May 2001

• Re: W3C RDFCore WG 2001-05-18 Teleconference Minutes Dan Brickley
• Re: W3C RDFCore WG 2001-05-18 Teleconference Minutes Eric Miller
• Re: W3C RDFCore WG 2001-05-18 Teleconference Minutes Eric Miller

Friday, 18 May 2001

• an interpretation of aboutEach [was: Issue rdf-ns-prefix-confusion] Dan Connolly
• W3C RDFCore WG 2001-05-18 Teleconference Minutes Eric Miller
• Re: an XML Schema intro from an RDF angle [was: Helping...] Dan Connolly
• 5/18 RDF Core Minutes/IRC Frank Manola
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements Art Barstow
• RE: A synthesis for #rdfms-resource-semantics Bill dehOra
• Re: Issue rdfms-uri-substructure Graham Klyne
• Re: an XML Schema intro from an RDF angle [was: Helping...] Graham Klyne
• YA reification thread Art Barstow
• Containers and the RDF Model (A3) Dan Brickley
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Martyn Horner
• Re: Communication with IG Dan Brickley
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Brian McBride
• Re: Issue rdfms-uri-substructure Brian McBride
• Re: Regrests Brian McBride
• Re: apologies Brian McBride
• Communication with IG Aaron Swartz
• an XML Schema intro from an RDF angle [was: Helping...] Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Frank Boumphrey
• Regrests Ora.Lassila@nokia.com

Thursday, 17 May 2001

• Issue rdfms-uri-substructure Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Aaron Swartz
• Test Cases for Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Current use of RDF features Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Graham Klyne
• Helping WG members gain RDF Hands-on experience (was Re: RDFCore WG 2001-05-18 Teleconference Agenda) Dan Brickley
• Re: Issue #rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dan Connolly
• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-05-18 Teleconference Agenda Aaron Swartz
• RE: apologies Rael Dornfest
• apologies R.V.Guha
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Dave Beckett
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Current use of RDF features Martyn Horner
• Re: Draft Minutes of 2001-05-11 Teleconference Dan Connolly
• RDFCore WG 2001-05-18 Teleconference Agenda Brian McBride
• Re: Draft Minutes of 2001-05-11 Teleconference Brian McBride
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements Brian McBride
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements Jan Grant

Monday, 14 May 2001

• Re: What do the ontologists want? Jonathan Borden
• Re: Proposal to use MIME types to modify interpretation of content Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposal to use MIME types to modify interpretation of content Graham Klyne
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-sem antics Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue #mime-types-for-rdf-docs Graham Klyne
• RE: What do the ontologists want? Ron Daniel
• Re: What do the ontologists want? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Introduction - Ron Daniel Ron Daniel
• Re: A synthesis for #rdfms-resource-semantics Frank Manola
• Re: What do the ontologists want? Frank Manola

Sunday, 13 May 2001

• Re: Followup on rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Followup on rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 12 May 2001

• What do the ontologists want? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 11 May 2001

• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-sem antics Aaron Swartz
• Re: More questions Aaron Swartz
• Re: A synthesis for #rdfms-resource-semantics Aaron Swartz
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-sem antics Graham Klyne
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-sem antics Graham Klyne
• Re: More questions Graham Klyne
• Re: A shot at rdfms-resource-semantics Graham Klyne
• Draft Minutes of 2001-05-11 Teleconference Dave Beckett
• Re: A synthesis for #rdfms-resource-semantics Dan Connolly
• Re: A synthesis for #rdfms-resource-semantics Jan Grant
• A synthesis for #rdfms-resource-semantics Martyn Horner
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Dave Beckett
• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-05-11 teleconference agenda jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• apologies Bill dehOra
• Introduction Frank Boumphrey
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semanti cs Frank Boumphrey
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semantics Frank Boumphrey

Thursday, 10 May 2001

• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue #mime-types-for-rdf-docs Dan Connolly
• RDFCore WG 2001-05-11 teleconference agenda Brian McBride
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semanti cs Frank Manola
• Re: Issue rdfms-empty-property-elements Jan Grant
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semanti cs Brian McBride

Wednesday, 9 May 2001

• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Implementations that use/support reification Brian McBride
• Re: Implementations that use/support reification Art Barstow
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Brian McBride
• Implementations that use/support reification Brian McBride
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semanti cs Frank Manola
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Introduction- Bill de hÓra Bill dehOra
• Re: Followup on rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Dave Beckett
• Re: Issue rdfms-empty-property-elements Dan Connolly
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-empty-property-elements Jan Grant
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semanti cs jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusioN Aaron Swartz

Tuesday, 8 May 2001

• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semanti cs Aaron Swartz
• Re: More questions Aaron Swartz
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semantics jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: A shot back at #rdfms-resource-semantics Frank Manola
• Re: A shot back at #rdfms-resource-semantics Brian McBride
• Re: A shot back at #rdfms-resource-semantics Dan Connolly
• Re: A shot back at #rdfms-resource-semantics Martyn Horner
• Re: A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semantics Brian McBride
• Re: More questions Brian McBride
• Re: A shot at rdfms-resource-semantics Dan Connolly
• More questions Martyn Horner
• A shot at http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semantics Martyn Horner

Monday, 7 May 2001

• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Frank Manola
• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-04-27 teleconference agenda Brian McBride
• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-04-27 teleconference agenda - updated Brian McBride

Sunday, 6 May 2001

• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Graham Klyne
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusioN Graham Klyne

Saturday, 5 May 2001

• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdf-containers-syn tax-ambiguity Graham Klyne

Friday, 4 May 2001

• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Aaron Swartz

Thursday, 3 May 2001

• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Dan Connolly
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Brian McBride

Wednesday, 2 May 2001

• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Aaron Swartz
• Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Frank Manola
• Re: Followup on rdf-ns-prefix-confusion Aaron Swartz
• Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs Aaron Swartz
• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-04-27 teleconference agenda Aaron Swartz
• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-04-27 teleconference agenda Brian McBride

Tuesday, 1 May 2001

• Re: RDFCore WG 2001-04-27 teleconference agenda Mike Dean

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2001 21:52:08 UTC