- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:05:52 -0500
- To: fmanola@mitre.org
- CC: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Frank Manola wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > > [[[ > > 4. A person is between a rock and a hard place. > > [...] > > > > Following is the KIF representation: > > > > (exists ((?x person) (?y rock) (?z place) (?w hard)) > > (and (betw ?y ?z ?x) (attr ?z ?w))) > > ]]] > > > > -- Conceptual Graph Examples > > http://www.bestweb.net/~sowa/cg/cgexampw.htm#Ex_4 > > Thu, 22 Mar 2001 01:45:12 GMT > > linked from http://www.bestweb.net/~sowa/cg/ > > linked from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/CG#[2] > > Yes, that was the interpretation I'd been assuming as well (see my > message > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0326.html) Ah... good... then we're agreed, on the essential point. [...] > So I don't understand how queries come into > this. Then never mind; somebody was convinced by the bookseller scenario about the need for existentials in RDF, so I thought I'd try it here. But I don't need the WG to agree with the bookseller/query scenario; only with the interpretation of triples as (exists (?a1 ?a2 ...) (and (p1 s1 ?a1) ...) ). -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 29 June 2001 12:05:58 UTC