- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:14:31 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, June 27, 2001, at 09:23 AM, Brian McBride wrote: >> Who said it had to be this way? The outcome is dependent on the >> results of the xmllang issue, but I don't believe it's a stretch >> at all to see: >> >> _:a <foo:bar> <data:text/plain;lang=en;weekend> . >> _:a <foo:bar> <data:text/plain;lang=fr;weekend> . >> >> or some other, similar syntax to do the same thing. > > I think one of the motivations for suggesting this change was to deal > with the xml:lang issue in the way I suggested. I was just pointing > out that there were problems with this. > > Could you just remind me what the advantages of representing literals > in this way would be. Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest that it was advantageous -- merely that it was a possibility that it should be kept in mind. Sorry for the misunderstanding. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2001 21:14:49 UTC