- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:38:53 -0700
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
pat hayes wrote: > > >jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote: > >[...] > > > > The set of statements that are subject > > > > of semantic interpretation can be selected in an unspecified, > > > > application-specific way. For some reason, several people seem to be unhappy about the above side remark of mine. If it does not make sense, well scrap it. [...] > You guys at db.stanford really do all think alike, don't you? :-) If you mean Stefan, we do have lots of opinionated discussions on many RDF-related issues. However, I'm glad that we look consistent from the outside ;) > While I agree with your overall theme here, it seems to go beyond the > remit of RDFcore, as it requires a basic change to the language. I'm happy to hear that layering is not a hopeless venue. I'd very much appreciate your help along those lines, since several of the RDFCore members including myself are far from being experts in formal logic. I apologize in advance for many things that I will be arguing for that may not make sense. In particular, I hope you could find time to summarize the approaches to reification extensively discussed on rdf-logic (Brian called for a summary on that issue a couple of days ago). That would be a great help, especially for the F2F. Sergey
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 19:12:33 UTC