- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:37:55 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:53:12AM +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
> I have updated the test cases and they are now in:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/
WRT #5:
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf
is the following legal:
<rdf:DF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
<rdf:_1/>
</rdf:RDF>
If so, it would be good to add a test for this special case.
WRT #6:
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test006.nt
why is this triple added to the last sub-case:
<http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test006.rdf#e3>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#_1> _:stmt1 .
Art
---
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 09:39:03 UTC