- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:04:09 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Graham Klyne wrote: > > I note that one of the options for 5.1.2 is "None". The transfer protocol > *might* supply a value, but then again it might not. > > Maybe we might say that a relative URI is meaningful only if there *is* a > URI (per 5.1.1-5.1.4) relative to which it can be evaluated? If by 'meaningful' you mean specified, then yes, that makes sense: if the base URI is unspecified, then the absolute form of any relative URI reference is also unspecified. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 15:04:15 UTC