Re: #rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity, #rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema

On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
> > When you say _1 is functional, is that a property of
> > rdf:_1 wherever it is found, or is that a property of rdf:_1
> > when it is applied to containers?
>
> Also where is this property specified?

section 5 ('formal model') of M+S suggests that _n properties are
functional (a term introduced to RDF by the DAML+OIL specs I believe) when
applied to M+S containers. I believe it is silent w.r.t. other uses...

dan

Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 16:17:20 UTC